Jung and UFOs: A Psychiatrist Debunker of UFOs
Posted: Sunday, December 19, 2010
by Paul Schroeder
alien / demonic attachment
(author's note:all images are in public domain)
Flying Saucers : A Modern Myth of Things Seen in the Skies (Paperback)
The first English edition was in print, published in 1959.
"Flying Saucers, A Modern Myth of Things Seen in the Skies, is controversial psychoanalyst C.G. Jung's floundering attempt to somehow embrace the UFO phenomenon with a logic that simply does not exist in the UFO realm.
Reading this book, seeing his thoughts emerge on paper, one can see the real struggle that he had intellectually with indigestible experiences of high strangeness with aliens; his explanations seem stranger and weirder than some of the actual phenomenon itself!
Jung holds that alien UFO technological craft which morph into different shapes, wink out and reappear and transport human abductees are a mere projection of mankind's "collective unconscious".
He states that although secularized Western Civilization's Everyman has lost belief in any paranormal God of Christianity/ Judaism that, nonetheless, the human psyche has a religious, myth-making function which is unconscious in nature and which cannot be turned off.
Jung's seems clearly baffled when he postulates that at our core, even in especially "rational" or especially atheistic modern thinking human beings, is a deep, secret religious longing.
A "conflict occurs", he claims, because the conscious mind has rejected God; the "collective unconscious" 'compensates' for this by projecting illusions, hallucinations of UFOs as well as hallucinations of the alien beings who pilot them.
To Jung, the global phenomenon of reported UFOs and their alien beings is a mere 'projection' of our unconscious desire; we 'create' an ersatz psychological substitute for God.
“A formally trained shrink, in this realm, is as useless as teats on a bull”
Jung further also goes on to connect people who see UFOs and the abduction phenomenon with the universal anxieties they have that were created by World War II and the Cold War.
Somehow, human fears are transformed, become reduced into projections of flying saucers, in his words, "a modern myth of things seen in the sky".
Had Jung meant all this on a sheer symbolic level, he would have made more innate horse sense.
UFO observations, though non-religious by nature, DO encompass a similarity to the "spiritual" or semi-religious dimension, in many tangential ways:
Part of the phenomenon does involve astral abductions; one's body is left behind in a car, or in bed, and one's spiritual essences are extracted, 'vibrated' out of one's body..
One reports seeing one's body receding below as one is ascending into an overhead craft..
One's astral essences do maintain all of one's personality traits and idiosyncratic fine judgmental qualities.
As well, some power seeking abductees do surely assume the role of purported prophets who bring messages of occult truth and shaman like salvation from the aliens, who in effect become like new gods.
There IS a strong connection between the ideas of abductees and those native to the ideas of Theosophy.
And there ARE strong similarities between the predatory spiritual treatment of abductees by aliens and the too easily dismissed ancient notions of demonic possession.
However, Jung goes much further than such symbolic associations by connecting UFOs to his personal more contentious idea about a LITERAL collective unconscious, its "projections" and its "archetypes".
To his mind, a flying saucer is an archetype, compared to the mandala, its round shape a universal symbol of' wholeness'.
Jung is always however sufficiently unclear as to whether he regards these psychic projections in some sense real, or whether they are to his thinking sheer internal, subjective illusions.
He does not elucidate whether he sees UFOs as hallucinations, or if they may then exist as physical entities
Jung leads one to believe that he sees the supernatural in a literal sense, but that he would never say this explicitly, because of his trained "scientific" pretenses.
.
He may have in some way seen himself as a psychological prophet of the occult's salvation or seen himself as its apologist.
The rest of the book is even more far-fetched; Jung makes more highly subjective and idiosyncratic analysis of some dreams and paintings that do in some way deal with UFOs.
Jung painfully squeezes all kinds of "mythological" symbolism from them and finally in this book goes on to
review the quasi-religious musings of an abductee, Orfeo Angelucci, whom he calls "naïve".
The similarities between the messages received by Orfeo from aliens, to certain religious notions, are indeed somewhat striking.
But, The Collective Unconscious? !
A better explanation is that "naïve" Orfeo had been reading Theosophical literature...
I can't say I was convinced by any of the contents.
"Flying Saucers", gives one a glimpse of how Jung approached UFO paranormal experiences as quasi-religious phenomena, as he painfully could not accept or understand these experiences at face value.
If I were able to write him an angry letter, it would say:
Dear Carl,
You're so completely "all wet" that you may as well be a fish and not at all a thinking human being; I have for years, personally had contact, seen these entities and their craft mentioned by so many other abductees the world over, and seen them eyeball-to eyeball.
You're an educated P.H.D. trained to be simple minded, and one with gall to preach such reasonable logical nonsense and horseapples, to ME, of all people.
I know, for a certainty, having passed many psychiatric and neurological medical exams, that I am not schizophrenic, not mentally ill, hallucinating, paranoid or suffering brain lesions for having experienced these alien beings and seen their craft; without question, these encounters clearly contradict everything that you (and I )have ever learned or been told by clearly uninformed others.
You cannot see your UFO nose on your face and thus assert that it's UNIVERSALLY not there but a projected mental image from that conflict.
Others, who know better, assure you that your UFO nose, contrary to your opinion, is UNIVERSALLY, in fact, actually there.
To persist in such logical pseudo scientific assertions, to a person like me who has both seen UFOs and aliens, is an inane attempt to contradict / explain away my direct experiences of such things.
Such persistence is a waste of time and energy and one surely of disinformation; it reveals some crippled faculties of understanding for other's experiences far different from and beyond your own clearly limited experiences .
A formally trained shrink, in this realm, is as useless as teats on a bull....
Convince others who may argue whether their own UFO nose IS or ISN'T really there; I and others who are abductees, hold ourselves up as a mirror to you.
Our written accounts of our experiences demonstate how useless your pseudo logical analysis IS, in the face of these, our contrary experiences.
We hold our UFO noses high up in the air, in indignation at your clever notion that we imagined it all.
You're not a singularity of cynicism; there are also many others.
A leap in consciousness will require a dissolution and restructuring of your beliefs about the nature of reality; to live unburdened by an insatiable curiosity to comprehend the mysteries of the universe is quite an amazing thing, in itself.
The history of mankind has been punctuated by personalities who refused to be bound by the grand illusion of space and time, seekers who penetrated the limitations of space and form.
Knowing the aliens reside in a different reality explains why this whole UFO phenomenon is so slippery; we exist within a matrix of other realities all merging in one spot: the mind.
Aliens and their craft exist.
My expanded consciousness and mental abilities are merely the outcome of my contacts with them.
Their world coexists with our own intimately intertwined and separated by the thinnest veil- our arrogant assumption that we are the sole proprietors of the only reality.
Affection,
Paul Schroeder
Director of CIA, Admiral R.H. Hillenkoetter: "It is time for the truth to be brought out in open Congressional hearings. Behind the scenes, high-ranking Air Force officers are soberly concerned about UFOs. But through official secrecy and ridicule, citizens are led to believe the unknown flying objects are nonsense. To hide the facts, the Air Force has silenced its personnel." p. 58, quoted from New York Times, February 28, 1960, p. L30
This Article has been viewed 664 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
Top-level comments on this article: (5 total)Freud was mostly 'all wet', as well......Please log in to respond to this comment.
A formally trained shrink, in this realm, is as useless as teats on a bull....Please log in to respond to this comment.
Although the mind can and does project illusions and hallucinations- I don't think Jung was considering the large amount of people involved in the UFO phenomenon- maybe he didn't even know.I think that the mind does hallucinate things like the Virgin sightings and religious visions. But in order for the mind to hallucinate it must first have some kind of imagined model in mind to go by- What Jung was forgetting is that UFO sightings were being made long before humans had any idea at all of what they might look like. That's why they would be described as animals in the sky- like dragons or horses or birds- that's all the people then knew about.That's why the ancient peoples made the grotesque masks and called them gods- some of them look to us now, like strangely designed helmets and gas masks.All they did was try to copy what they saw.Like the giant cyclops- if we draw what they described then- we see a helmet like an astronauts' with one big "eye" in the middle.The UFOs they saw back then could not have been hallucinations- their minds had nothing to use as a model for them at that time.It's all very interesting to study- more and more becomes clear now that we know what it is we're seeing.Good article Paul- I enjoyed it- Always- EllaPlease log in to respond to this comment.
I suppose one day we shall all know with reasonable certainty the existence of alien beings and if so their modes of transportation and mental capabilities. I personally feel that with what we already do have scientific evidence to support that it would be indeed quite naive to deny the almost certain existence of alien life forms. However, until ample and sufficient evidence does present itself you will have those that persist in their denial of such things. Just as you have those that still deny that the world is more than just a few thousand years old and not the center of the universe. Go figure. I often wonder if world events are not precipitated and manipulated by alien intelligence, or lack thereof, and we simply pawns in there game much like Mario in a "game boy" game.Please log in to respond to this comment.You have stumbled onto a horrible truth much too terrible for the world to accept or to digest or to even think about, when you state:
"I often wonder if world events are not precipitated and manipulated by alien intelligence, or lack thereof, and we simply pawns in there game much like Mario in a "game boy" game. "
You are dead center on a target many couldn't see to shoot at and you hit a bullseye!
We are trapped in a reptilian matrix, a holograph of horror and joy orchestrated by the very entities who I write about.
KUDOS! (and mutual condolences)
PaulPlease log in to respond to this comment.
Interesting article Paul. Jung continually questioned many things in life and it was a life of continual unrest but I must say is his answer one that is all wrong and your answer one that is all right? Is there no room for error on either side?Please log in to respond to this comment.
We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.